Proprietary Software Or Open Source ?
I
use a lot of open source software in my daily life. Android, Linux,
infact, I am currently typing on a Ubuntu machine. I’m also a user
of closed source (proprietary) software such as Windows 10 and
am a big fan of certain pieces of software and OS’s so I thought it
would be a good idea to look at the merits of open and closed source
software.
So what is Open Source?
In
Software terms, open
source refers
to a software which has it’s source code freely available on
the Internet to download. In comparison, the source code for
proprietary commercial software is usually a closely guarded secret
of the company.
Open
source software is distributed under different
types of licenses such
as LGPL, GNU, BSD, Apache, etc. In nearly all these cases the
software can be used without paying a fee. It should be noted that
sometimes large organizations distribute the source code, such as
Apache, Open Office, Mozilla, etc.
Something
else to consider is that you can modify open source software to add
capabilities not originally in the software.
So what is Closed Source (Proprietary)?
In
software terms closed
source software
often refers to software which is owned by someone (or an
organization) and often the only way to get hold of the software is
through purchasing a physical product or a digital product from
retailers, resellers or the owner’s website.
Some
closed source software is distributed as ‘shareware’. Often it’s
a fully functional version of the software but either with a limited
amount of options available to use in it or a full version that is
limited to a set period of time after which the software will disable
itself. One of the most common shareware that springs to my mind
is ‘Doom’
a first person shooter (FPS) from
the 1990’s which was a hit because of being shareware.
Often
companies offer demos and trials of their software and function
somewhat similar to shareware where it has been designed to expire
after some period of time and/or may have limited features.
Are there other types of models?
Yes,
it is also possible to get hold of software which is free to use
(i.e. Freeware) but often there is no access to the source code.
There
is also a Freemium model whereby basic services are provided free of
charge in the software while more advanced features must be paid for.
This is often found in Android and iOS applications.
Innovation
Often
I have pondered whether this is the case as an argument is that
people go to open source as it is free to use and also the software
is often a little behind on a commercial product (such as Open &
Libre Office vs Microsoft Office).
Although
in this case Microsoft have the infrastructure to have cloud versions
of Office and Dropbox/One drive integration whereas open source
software does not, there are other cases where open source software
has generated new ideas that improve the software and extend and
build upon existing concepts.
(CyanogenMod
is a good example of innovation in Android)
A
good example of this is Google’s
Android OS and CyanogenMod (a
fork of the AOSP version
of Android). Some of the features and ideas have been implemented in
the latest version of Android Lollipop 5.0 OS.
Often
open source projects aren’t burdened by the need to generate
revenue or protect market share, (which is where the need for
innovation comes from in large companies and organizations) and many
minds from various backgrounds can solve difficult problems, compared
to one team in a building.
Support for software and bug fixes
Many
open source software in terms of bug fixes and support are rock solid
and sometimes can be better than closed source counterparts. However,
the opposite extreme is that there are open source projects that are
abandoned, and others which have security flaws that haven’t been
patched or some that take a long time to roll out bug fixes.
In
this case it would be best to consider that closed source software is
more likely to have better, bug fixes being rolled out on a regular
basis and better support as they created the software whereas in open
source the feature you use may be an addition added on by a
programmer who may not being working on the project any longer.
Usability
Usability
is often a major area of criticism for open source software because
the technology is generally not reviewed by usability experts and
caters to developers rather than the vast majority of layperson
users. User guides are not required by law and are therefore often
ignored. When manuals are written, they are often filled with jargon
that is difficult to follow.
For
closed or proprietary software, usability is a high selling point
(think Apple again) due to expert usability testing for a more
targeted audience. User manuals are also provided for immediate
reference and quick training, while support services help to maximize
use of the software. Third party systems and developers are also able
to use a variety of mechanisms to enhance “closed” source
software.
Security
Security
of open source is often a concern for large companies because
software is not always developed in a controlled environment.
With
individual users all around the world developing the software, there
is a lack of continuity and common direction that prevents effective
communication. Once more, the software is not always peer-reviewed or
validated, meaning that a programmer can embed a backdoor Trojan into
the software while the user is none the wiser.
One
way to reduce this potential risk is to adopt a reputable brand with
a concentrated development team supported by a strong online
community.
Propriety
or closed software is generally seen as more secure because it is
developed in a controlled environment by a concentrated team with a
common direction. This team is the only group that can view or edit
the source code, it is heavily audited and the risk of backdoor
Trojans or bugs are reduced (though no security can be flawless).
The
key pros and cons of open vs closed source software largely
depend on your technical expertise and resources available to
maintain and update the software. Consider the five points outlined
in this article to get a better idea of the right software for your
company’s needs now and in the future.
Service
Open
source software relies on a loyal and engaged online user community
to deliver support via forums and blogs, but this support often fails
to deliver the high level of response that many consumers expect (and
can receive with proprietary software).
These
communities must also be found on the web and some would argue there
is no incentive for the community to address a user’s problem.
Service
and support are probably the greatest advantages of using proprietary
software (closed). Ongoing support is a key selling point for users
with little technical skills and one of the main reasons people
choose closed source over open source software.
Support
includes user manuals and points of contact for immediate
assistance from viable companies with experts who are intimately
familiar with the products and services.
Cost
One
of the main advantages of open source software is the cost; however,
when applied to OSS, the term “free” has less to do with overall
cost and more to do with freedom from restrictions.
If
you have the in-house capabilities and technical expertise to
maintain the software, and resources to implement, train and provide
support to staff, then open source may be most cost-effective for
your organization. You should consider, however, the long-term costs
of implementation, innovation, providing support, and investing in
infrastructure as your company evolves, technology changes, and your
needs grow.
Open
software providers are also increasingly charging for extras like
add-ons, integration, and additional services, which can negate any
cost-saving advantages in some cases. In the end, rather than being
free, you are still paying for a service with open source software.
For
a Closed Source CMS, depending on the complexity of the system,
the cost can vary between a few thousand to a few hundred
thousand dollars, which includes a base fee for software, integration
and services and annual licensing/support fees. While the hard cost
can be higher, what you get in return is a more customized product
from a trusted brand, higher levels of security and functionality,
continuous innovation, greater scalability, ongoing training and
support and a lower requirement for technical skills.
With
big companies like Google now backing Open Source, some of its flaws
like usability are no more an issue for most people at least in the
case of Android and Chrome OS but the security issues still haunt
Google’s android much more than they do Apple’s iOS which is a
proprietary software. Although, Microsoft Windows suffers similar
security issues as well despite being a closed source platform. So
which do you prefer?
Comments
Post a Comment